Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tangere Notes's avatar

It’s hard to keep up with all of this and I adore it. I appreciate that you are seeking to name what can’t be fully named?

I am in a space of understanding there is so much more. I am understanding the way our structures and systems are keeping us en masse from these truths. And yet these truths are not of the conscious mind. They will not be understood, shared, and transferred this way?

But I do find some comfort that while we won’t and can’t name this in the same way, that there’s a shared understanding that a presence of other frequencies/channels/layers is there for us to access and explore if we are open to it. An old and new frontier?

For me, I think there’s also an acceptance that this is a way to be that will never result in full knowing. It’s a commitment to honoring the unknowing? And respecting the limitations of what’s known?

With all of that said, it’s very hard for me to give up believing that I can boil this down to something explicable, my brain is still searching for that.

And yet I do find great value in what you’re writing here, the seeking to name does offer something.

Expand full comment
Phoebe's avatar

This was great. Created so much integration for me. I had Gestalt classes in grad school which talk about field and refer to these concepts, but there was no embodiment piece with the knowledge in the textbooks (most textbooks have little coding, useless) and the teachers weren’t embodied enough to give the encoding. So much of it dropped for me in an embodied way reading this piece, and also my own lifelong observations of the field began to harmonize with the schooling. Plus all your own magic, which I’m still downloading. Thanks 🙏

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts